Second Hundred Firms Fall Further Behind Am Law 100 on Growth and Profitability
The 2026 Am Law 200 rankings, based on 2025 financial results, show the historical gap between the largest firms and the "Second Hundred" widening again after a brief narrowing in 2024. Second Hundred firms posted 6% revenue growth, 5.2% revenue-per-lawyer growth, and 9.5% profits-per-equity-partner growth in 2025 — all trailing the Am Law 100's 13%, 8.7%, and 14% respective gains. Analysts attrib
BY FRONTIER DESK · JULY 2, 2026 · 1 MIN READ
The 2026 Am Law 200 rankings, based on 2025 financial results, show the historical gap between the largest firms and the "Second Hundred" widening again after a brief narrowing in 2024. Second Hundred firms posted 6% revenue growth, 5.2% revenue-per-lawyer growth, and 9.5% profits-per-equity-partner growth in 2025 — all trailing the Am Law 100's 13%, 8.7%, and 14% respective gains. Analysts attribute the divergence to a self-reinforcing dynamic: stronger balance sheets let top-100 firms pay more to attract laterals and their books of business, compounding revenue advantages, while heavy AI capital commitments (Kirkland & Ellis alone plans roughly $500 million over three to four years) are simply out of reach for most mid-sized firms. For CFOs and pricing teams outside the top tier, this signals that competing on scale-driven efficiency will get harder, pushing mid-sized firms toward niche specialization or M&A as the more viable path to margin protection.