Legal AI Pricing Transparency: 14 of 20 Major Vendors Publish No Price
HAQQ Legal AI's July 22 survey of 20 legal AI vendors found that 14 publish no price discoverable without a sales call. The six that do publish: HAQQ ($30/mo Chat Starter, $25/user/mo eFirm Boutique), Claude ($20/mo Pro, $25/seat/mo Team), Paxton ($499/user/mo), Genie AI ($75/mo Pro, $320/mo Business), Mike OS ($0 self-hosted), and Lexzur (tier structure without figures). At the enterprise end, Ha
BY FRONTIER DESK · JULY 27, 2026 · 1 MIN READ
HAQQ Legal AI's July 22 survey of 20 legal AI vendors found that 14 publish no price discoverable without a sales call. The six that do publish: HAQQ ($30/mo Chat Starter, $25/user/mo eFirm Boutique), Claude ($20/mo Pro, $25/seat/mo Team), Paxton ($499/user/mo), Genie AI ($75/mo Pro, $320/mo Business), Mike OS ($0 self-hosted), and Lexzur (tier structure without figures). At the enterprise end, Harvey is quote-only with reported pricing of ~$1,200/seat for mid-market and $100–200/seat at 200+ seats. PwC's concurrent analysis identifies the structural split: premium hourly/value-based pricing for pure judgment work; fixed fees for AI-enabled outputs with human review; and subscription/per-transaction for high-volume standardized work. For legal tech operators, the pricing opacity of most platforms creates a GTM opportunity for products that publish transparent pricing — and a competitive risk if enterprise buyers are demanding pricing comparisons that most vendors won't support.