Alabama's State Bar published Formal Opinion 2026-01, Artificial Intelligence Use: Best Practices Under Existing Professional Conduct Rules (August 4, National Law Review). The opinion does not create new ethical obligations — it recontextualises existing duties (competence, confidentiality, supervision, communication, candor, reasonable fees) in light of AI-assisted and agentic AI use. The agenti
The Connecticut Supreme Court issued its first decision addressing sanctions for AI-generated hallucinated citations (August 1, Reuters). The court sanctioned a lawyer who submitted documents containing "erroneous and unverified citations as a result of the use of generative AI." The sanction: six additional hours of continuing legal education on ethics and law office management beyond the state's
Connecticut's AI Responsibility and Transparency Act (CART Act, Public Act 26-15, signed June 2, 2026) entered its compliance window this week, with most obligations effective October 1, 2026. The statute covers: employment-related automated decision technology (AEDT) — employers using AI in hiring or employment decisions must provide written notice of the system's purpose, data categories, and so
Reuters (July 27) published analysis showing US state attorneys general are deploying consumer protection, professional licensing, privacy, and advertising law to address AI conduct — with no AI-specific statute required. The consistent lesson from recent AG enforcement: regulators will evaluate AI through existing legal frameworks and expect companies to demonstrate that governance, disclosures,
The Alabama State Bar issued "Artificial Intelligence Use: Best Practices Under Existing Professional Conduct Rules" (July 23), clarifying how existing duties apply to AI — drawing on ABA Formal Opinion 512 and citing recent sanctions cases. Key rules: lawyers may charge for time spent reviewing, correcting, and applying professional judgment to AI-generated work, but cannot bill for time that "wo
Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed SB 26-189 on May 14, 2026, repealing and replacing the state's pioneering Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (SB 24-205) — the first comprehensive state AI law in the US — before it ever applied. The original CAIA, which was set to take effect June 30, 2026, had been simultaneously in force, unenforced (paused by a federal court order on April 27, 2026), and
A plan taking shape in Washington would create an independent AI regulator modeled on FINRA — a private, industry-funded organization reporting to the SEC, staffed largely from the industry it regulates — to vet the most capable AI models before release. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent helped develop the proposal; it now sits with White House chief of staff Susie Wiles. In the first phase, labs w
Deloitte Legal's AI Imperative report — based on 121 senior legal leaders globally surveyed April–May 2026 — contained a careers and talent section this week drawing specific attention from the legal press: the report warns of a "fundamental change" with "structural consequences" for lawyers at all career levels, drawing a parallel to the tech sector's experience of AI-driven role restructuring. 8
DAC Beachcroft's July 9 analysis of the EU–US Data Privacy Framework (DPF) provides the most measured current assessment of transatlantic data transfer risk for law firms: the DPF remains formally in force as of July 2026, transfers under it are still lawful, and the Latombe appeal (which challenges its validity) remains pending without judgment. The destabilising factors the analysis identifies a
A coalition of 42 state attorneys general has launched a coordinated investigation into OpenAI, focusing on consumer protection, data use, and risks to minors. The action builds on Florida's earlier lawsuit against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman — alleging that the company knowingly released addictive and unsafe chatbot technology — and signals a structural shift from isolated state claims to multi-sta
A NALP Foundation survey of 1,302 graduates of ABA-accredited law schools, published July 7, found that 48% of early-career lawyers now consider AI an essential part of their daily work, using it primarily for legal research (57%), compiling and synthesizing information (55%), and drafting documents (40%). Critically, 96% of this cohort — the class of 2022 — graduated before ChatGPT debuted, meani
Florida's amended Rule 2.515, effective June 15, 2026, requires every filer to certify that legal authorities cited exist and are accurately represented — a verification duty rather than an AI ban or disclosure rule. In the first eight days of June, federal courts across four circuits (7th, 6th, 9th, and a Mississippi district) sanctioned counsel for AI-fabricated briefs and citations, with penalt
The New York State Bar Association published guidance this week on Part 161, "Use of Artificial Intelligence," analyzing what the rule means for attorneys using AI in practice. While the full text of the final rule is under review, the NYSBA guidance addresses competence obligations, supervision of AI output, confidentiality in AI tool selection, and disclosure obligations to clients and courts. N
The Trump Administration's AI preemption framework, unveiled March 20, 2026, and actively advancing through June, proposes uniform federal AI rules that would preempt 194 state-level AI laws across 45 states. The Informed Clearly analysis published June 25 documents the scope: if enacted, the framework would nullify state-level AI liability, disclosure, and bias-audit requirements including Califo